Calcutta HC orders fresh trial of 10 cases tied to Nandigram agitation


Calcutta HC orders fresh trial of 10 cases tied to Nandigram agitation

KOLKATA: Calcutta high court Monday sent up for fresh trial 10 criminal cases, including murder cases, lodged during the Left Front tenure, overturning East Midnapore lower court orders allowing a state plea to withdraw them. The cases were filed at Nandigram and Khejuri police stations during violent land acquisition movements in 2007 and again in 2009.
After the Mamata Banerjee govt came to office in 2011, the state cabinet in 2014 ratified a move to withdraw these cases, among others, reasoning that “poor land losers fought for their cause against the then land policy to protect their livelihood as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. They had to some extent exercised the right of private defence. Police had launched formal criminal prosecution against those farmers at the instance of then govt.” Pleas were allowed by lower courts under CrPC Sec 321 (withdrawal from prosecution). These were challenged in HC.
A division bench of Justices Debangsu Basak and Md Shabbar Rashidi disagreed with the state. HC in its 44-page order said: “Accused in the 10 criminal cases must stand trial. Murders did take place. Postmortem reports available with the case diaries establish such facts. Therefore, as on date, in society there are persons who are guilty of such murders. Allowing the prosecution to withdraw under CrPC Sec 321 will not be in public interest. In fact, it would cause public harm and injury.”
HC also chose to differ with advocate general Kishore Datta’s argument of “political vendetta and right to self-defence”, saying political vendetta was “of no consequence” when the criminal case had substance. “The present criminal cases involve multiple murders. It has been accepted by the state that some persons allegedly exercised a right of private defence. Whether or not private defence was available to the accused is an issue which is required to be decided at trial,” the court said.
“Eradication of violence of any form in a society is an ideal which a state should strive for. In a democracy, violence in any manner or form, either pre- or post-poll, should be eschewed. Any attempt to justify a crime and clothing it with political issues is insufferable,” HC said. “More than 10 people had been murdered… Criminal cases with regard to such incidents must not, let alone should not, be allowed to be withdrawn…on grounds of return of peace and tranquillity. Society cannot be at peace, tranquillity with murderers roaming around without fear of prosecution.”





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *